[rxsid]

"But one quick question, what do you mean he must have been warned? Like he got some inside info? If so, what kind of info could cause him to take on the subject?"

In the context of my previous statement, it would seem perhaps the only reasonable explanation as to why he would openly (and multiple times) mock and potentially alienate a (undoubtedly) significant portion of his listener-ship/viewer-ship. That's not a good business decision.

As has been mentioned above here, the FCC controls the licenses of all those mentioned here. I believe it's withing the realm of possibilities that someone from the FCC (or other regulatory agency?) warned the talkers that this topic is off limits if they want to keep their licenses active and avoid some trumped up legal headaches.

[rxsid]

withing the realm -> within the realm

[hoosiermama]

Just giving them a few names might make them shut up.

They would have the research department to see who these people were: Lois Anderson for one.

[American Constitutionalist]

FREE AMERICA BROADCASTING.....

What they are doing is a direct violation of the 1st amendment...