Didnt OKeefe let these idiots stick their necks out before and then he pulled yet another video out of his hat? It would be sweet if he rope-a-dopes them again.
Posted on 01/27/2010 12:33:50 PM PST by ocr1
Something is fishy with the whole story. Will wait for Okeefe to tell his side.
Yeah, O’Keefe was pretending to film the workers while he tried to film the staff. Simple as that. The listening device was probably another cell phone.
what happened yesterday was that it seems sadly there are many ion this country and even on here who will go with a media headline and never question.
It was the same when the raid on the LDS church went ahead
We had some screaming child abuse etc and yet not one abuse charge came to court.
I trust and hope that if I ever have to have a jury then I have those who do not go with the media headlines all the time and I'll take those who can question and think for themselves
The affadavit says they stated that they wanted access to the telephone system and to a telephone wiring closet.
If they merely wanted to talk to an office rep and record the conversation by hidden video,they could have pretended to be pizza guys or flower guys.
So, they walked into the Senator’s office and called the office phone to see if it rang? Is that what happened?
Maybe the phone was 'off the hook' thus simulating the 'continuous busy signals.'
Maybe he was there to perform a public service and put it back on the hook and thus into action.
Which doesn't mean there wasn't. Which is another point that could be made about this case I guess.
Let’s see....If I’m on my cell phone, standing in an office, and another person, sitting in a car blocks away, is on the other end of that conversation, is he “in possession of a “listening device”?
Didnt OKeefe let these idiots stick their necks out before and then he pulled yet another video out of his hat? It would be sweet if he rope-a-dopes them again.
Here is my question - what was an FBI agent assigned to the Violent Crime Squad doing investigating ‘phone manipulation’?
Unless he manipulated the phone to bludgeon someone to death, how is it “Violent Crime”?
Smells strongly of set-up!
I believe you meant to say “FLDS Church” not “LDS Church”.
you are indeed correct
thank you
many many questions which need to be answered I think and yes I agree with you , something smells fishy and the way the media twisted this was unreal even for them
BUMP
There are 10 indictments, 3 of which have resulted in convictions, for men in the FLDS compound having sex with minors.
That is a form of “child abuse”, although I know what you meant was that there was no OTHER form of “child abuse”, such as physical abuse or pedophilia.
Evidently the protesters were complaining about the phone system being shut down to ignore them.
Remember those silly vids he did in college?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4hrnbhIHDY
Maybe they took it too far this time.
thank you for understanding to what I was saying
Aah...he wanted to prove her phones were working and she was ignoring them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.