If these letters are being received via e-mail, the SMTP header will tell you the IP address of the server that sent it. That should be a start in tracking back to the sender.
Wonder if anyone at these newspapers is smart enough to figure that out?
I wonder if any of them want to do their JOB?
Don't you mean to ask if there is anyone at these newspapers WILLING to figure that out?
Of course they are, but that is precisely why we will never know.
All of those newspapers knew about John Edwards' affair but would not print it. They will sweep this under the rug, after all, they put hin into office.
If these letters are being received via e-mail, the SMTP header will tell you the IP address of the server that sent it. That should be a start in tracking back to the sender.From beforeitsnews.com:Wonder if anyone at these newspapers is smart enough to figure that out?
UPDATE: In more Ellie Light news, Dan Riehl and LeftCoastRebel are on the trail of Ellie Light.Also: Ed Morrissey forwarded me an e-mail he received from Ellie Light several days ago. The mail appears to have been routed through the IP address 212.24.236.50, which comes back to Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia??
I assume this is some sort of masking or spoofing device and not the actual location of "Ellie Light."
Which makes you wonder: why does a grandma writing letters on behalf of Obama use an IP spoofer?
Finally, the latest count for Ellie Light’s letter. It has appeared in at least 62 publications in 29 states and the District of Columbia; national publications and a Yahoo link; and 2 foreign publications.
Not bad for a single individual. Just think of how many rejects she got.