As I see it, the problem with the term RINO is that it is so poorly defined that it is becoming meaningless. I mean is there an actual consensus by anyone on what policies a person has to advocate in order to be a RINO?
LOL, let’s talk about it on another thread, it’s getting late. But I think it is safe to say that Rep. in name only is pretty descriptive, assuming that the conservative plank of the Rep. Party is assumed.
I think a general acceptance of the the three pillars of accepted conservatism on economic, social and natsecurity are required. I think also that the tone and manner in which a Rep. goes after his own is also a pass to rino land lol.