[Norman Greenbaum]

The support for Sarah Palin is legitimate and is strong and is valid -- here on Free Republic, regardless of what you "nattering nabobs of negativity" say... LOL...

Lulz - who's invalidating any support of Sarah Palin?

You clearly haven't been paying any attention; I HAVE been positive. It is John McCain who is the source of ANY "negativity."

I and others are perfectly within the bounds of sanity to be holding our noses while Palin "supports" McCain; We are HOPING against hope that somehow there's a pot o' gold at the end of this rainbow instead of a surprise sack of doggie-poo.

[Star Traveler]

You were saying ...

I and others are perfectly within the bounds of sanity to be holding our noses while Palin "supports" McCain; We are HOPING against hope that somehow there's a pot o' gold at the end of this rainbow instead of a surprise sack of doggie-poo.

Well, you coulda fooled me, since the title of this thread is --

Yes, Sarah Palin is a RINO.

[betty boop]

We are HOPING against hope that somehow there's a pot o' gold at the end of this rainbow instead of a surprise sack of doggie-poo.

This is the part I don't get: From what I understand of Sarah Palin's values and philosophical commitments (i.e., traditional, constitutional, specifically American), I would have thought she'd have preferred campaigning for J. D. Hayworth.

It seems clear to me Sarah "agrees" more with Hayworth philosophically and even temperamentally than she does with McCain.

Is this a stupid question: "Why is she then campaigning for McCain?"