Lulz - who's invalidating any support of Sarah Palin?
You clearly haven't been paying any attention; I HAVE been positive. It is John McCain who is the source of ANY "negativity."
I and others are perfectly within the bounds of sanity to be holding our noses while Palin "supports" McCain; We are HOPING against hope that somehow there's a pot o' gold at the end of this rainbow instead of a surprise sack of doggie-poo.
I and others are perfectly within the bounds of sanity to be holding our noses while Palin "supports" McCain; We are HOPING against hope that somehow there's a pot o' gold at the end of this rainbow instead of a surprise sack of doggie-poo.
Well, you coulda fooled me, since the title of this thread is --
This is the part I don't get: From what I understand of Sarah Palin's values and philosophical commitments (i.e., traditional, constitutional, specifically American), I would have thought she'd have preferred campaigning for J. D. Hayworth.
It seems clear to me Sarah "agrees" more with Hayworth philosophically and even temperamentally than she does with McCain.
Is this a stupid question: "Why is she then campaigning for McCain?"