Posted on 01/23/2010 10:19:54 AM PST by rabscuttle385
I'm just curious because all I've seen you post are articles bashing McCain, Palin, and Brown.
YOU: "I have no idea... you might want to ask the people who post these threads, though.... LOL..."
But hasn't that been your quibble on this thread with me?
You're right - you haven't any idea or else you'd have been re-directing your animus to those you blame for you own misunderstandings.
Good day, Madame Traveler.
Actually, rabs has a long, distinguised, and in my opinion admirable record of helping expose Mitt Romney for the fraud he is. Just FYI.
It ain’t rocket science. I like JD much better than McCain and Sarah better than either, so I’ll support JD to defeat McCain in 2010 and Sarah to defeat Romney, et al in 2012 should she decide to run.
I'm just curious because all I've seen you post are articles bashing McCain, Palin, and Brown.
Typical of the so-called "conservatives" who are so pure and so far-"somewhere" -- that they end up meeting far left liberals on the backside, butt-to-butt (but, of course, not "face-to-face")... LOL...
Liberals are laughing all the way to the political bank...
In my estimation, it’s personal obligation for Palin - a gesture of gratitude - the personal commitment being of greater significance and importance - not politically expedient.
McCain did not give Palin national political opportunity. She was rising regardless - McCain exploited the inevitable. To the contrary, McCain’s draft may have forced Palin on to the stage too early.
“Actually, rabs has a long, distinguised, and in my opinion admirable record of helping expose Mitt Romney for the fraud he is. Just FYI.”
What has he done for us lately.
Attack Palin
Attack Palin
oh and
Attack Palin
Actually, rabs has a long, distinguised, and in my opinion admirable record of helping expose Mitt Romney for the fraud he is. Just FYI.
He's goring the wrong political ox right now... :-)
But hasn't that been your quibble on this thread with me?
I'm saying take it up with the posters who put these threads out... not Sarah Palin or Sarah Palin supporters...
You did notice the title of the thread when you dropped by, didn't you?
“McCain did not give Palin national political opportunity. She was rising regardless - McCain exploited the inevitable. To the contrary, McCains draft may have forced Palin on to the stage too early.”
Right.
That speech at the RNC was a gift from the RINO, whether we like it or not. It was perhaps one of the biggest political gifts ever given. Without that, nobody talks about her. Period.
Absolutely political loyalty.
Well, n00b, tell us all about it.
And who did you vote for....Obama? You're doing an awful lot of bashing for a person that's only been here for a month.
>> It was perhaps one of the biggest political gifts ever given.
But to whom, Palin? She seems to be the obvious recipient, but maybe not.
Is the Palin Family’s life better for all of this? Who knows - this answer’s not obvious to me. A lot hurt accompanied this journey. A lot of humiliation, a lot of betrayal, a lot of personal exposure, and abuse to her and her family. I’m not sure that’s a gift.
The greatest gift is that provided by Palin to the Country - the hope that’s been decimated by the opposition.
Go JD! Go McCain .. [er] .. Sarah! The FR threads are going to be a source of great humor.
The REAL enemy is statism. A creeping trend toward statism in the Republican party contributed crucially to why and how Obama and his cronies got to be at the helm.
Our Founding Fathers didn't consider the individuals in the Royal Castle their REAL enemy, They knew the enemy was colonialism, taxation without representation, Royal decree. They would have fought it whether it was King George or Queen Elizabeth.
Likewise, we'd be fighting nationalized health care and cap and trade whether it was Obama or McCain. Obama and his cronies are enemies, yet it's their cause that we battle. It is statism; THAT is the enemy. For my money, the Republican party needs to travel toward the opposite of statism if it wants to unite Republicans, conservatives, and independents.
The FR threads are going to be a source of great humor.
You're more hilarious, right now... :-)
I didn't notice much loyalty and gratitude toward Sarah Palin oozing from McCain until he realized the "new political climate" he is facing for his re-election bid this fall. His tune changed quite a bit from what it was before. I think Sarah's loyalty is misplaced with this man. She owes him nothing. She fulfilled her duty as his VP pick and now it is time to move on.
She started out of the gate just fine, but has hit a rough patch now. I think that one of her stated goals was to help real conservative candidates whenever she could. No one could seriously argue that McCain is a "real conservative" candidate - could they?
If, as so many here keep pointing out - her endorsement of McCain is merely because of loyalty and gratitude - then it is truly a hollow endorsement. To me, it cheapens her future endorsements.
I don't think it is particularly 'special' for a politician to scratch another politician's back because of a previous favor - it's done all the time. It's called "politics as usual".
No kidding! We eat our own and they prosper and multiply.
And you’re a mindless downer.
Attack Palin
Attack Palin
oh and
Attack Palin
Attack Scott Brown. (added to the list to keep it current)
And youre a mindless downer.
Well, that's a step better than being simply "mindless"... LOL...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.