I agree with you, generally, about Bork, but there are essentially two ways to view the Second Amendment and Bork’s is the way that agrees with Ginsberg, Breyer, et al. No thanks.
Could be. Point is, whatever Bork’s personal opinions are, he is distinguished because his record reflects a belief in putting his personal opinions aside when sitting as a judge. That’s why I believe we missed a potentially great SCOTUS Justice when the DemoMarxists crucified him. They didn’t crucify him for nothing. He would have been the vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.