To: John Semmens
the editors wrote. “He’s against wasteful spending. He’s against higher taxes. He’s against the Islamic terrorists. He’s against social control of healthcare. But what is he for?” He is for - against wasteful spending
He is for - against higher taxes
He is for - against Islamic terrorists
He is for - against social control of healthcare
Way I see it, he's for plenty of things. The things I care about.
8 posted on
01/16/2010 10:16:54 AM PST by
libh8er
To: libh8er
the editors wrote. “He’s against wasteful spending. He’s against higher taxes. He’s against the Islamic terrorists. He’s against social control of healthcare. But what is he for?” Duh, I guess they are too dense to make inverse correlations so let me make it for them... He is FOR thrift in government He is FOR lower taxes He is FOR Americans being protected from terrorists He is FOR Americans having the freedom to choose their healthcare
13 posted on
01/16/2010 10:27:28 AM PST by
justsaynomore
(What we learn from history is that we do not learn anything from history, - George Bernard Shaw)
To: libh8er
“the editors wrote. “He’s against wasteful spending. He’s against higher taxes. He’s against the Islamic terrorists. He’s against social control of healthcare. But what is he for?”
That pretty much covers it in my book.
19 posted on
01/16/2010 10:37:14 AM PST by
Lou Budvis
(She never bankrupted Alaska or bowed to royalty.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson