Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2010 11:27:13 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Really? Now that’s a democrat I like.


2 posted on 01/11/2010 11:29:07 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

The RATS are running scared!


3 posted on 01/11/2010 11:29:45 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

They are going to freeze their tuchus off in ND if the electric rates rise like the EPA will do.


4 posted on 01/11/2010 11:32:06 AM PST by I still care (A Republic - if you can keep it. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp

Proposed by a RAT—no less. Whoa Baby


5 posted on 01/11/2010 11:33:03 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER ( EPA will rule your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The Alliance for Clear Climate Economics and Science Solutions (ACCESS) was created to ensure that any regulation of greenhouse gases using existing environmental laws not harm the economy and American jobs, be based on sound science and allow for public review of all underlying data and scientific analysis.

http://www.uschamber.com/co2/default

EPA has proposed a legal finding, pursuant to Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), that greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) emitted by new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. EPA’s theory, as it has been set forth in the Proposal, is that US. emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles contribute to global “air pollution,” which then in turn endangers US. public health or welfare.

It has been the consistent position of the U.S. Chamber that the CAA was never meant to regulate GHGs, and the convoluted test for endangerment EPA has manufactured in the Proposal only serves to highlight this point. As a matter of law, EPA lacks the authority to regulate worldwide air pollution under CAA Section 202(a), and its “domestic-global-domestic” endangerment test for GHGs is fatally flawed. However, even if this test were legally permissible, EPA has not adequately demonstrated from a legal or scientific perspective the necessary components of an endangerment finding for GHGs.

To compensate for these obvious legal and scientific shortcomings, EPA commits a wide range of “sins of omission,” willfully ignoring relevant, credible scientific information, including information generated by EPA’s own staff. EPA also willfully ignores the near-unavoidable chain of regulatory determinations and rulemakings that will result, a , matter f in one of the largest and most burdensome regulatory programs in American history. By relying only on data that supports its conclusion and ignoring anything and everything that calls its scientific and legal findings into question, this EPA has exhibited the exact same biased, politically-charged conduct many of its current employees criticized the Bush EPA for injecting into the regulatory process.

In an obvious attempt to mute criticism of the Proposal’s flaws, EPA has turned the endangerment process into a complicated game of “hide the ball.” It refused to incorporate any comments from last year’s ANPR into the record for the Proposal1—andhas given no indication whatsoever that its staff actually read the ANPR comments prior to issuing the Proposal—yet refused to extend the comment period on the grounds that the public had a chance to respond to much of the Proposal during the ANPR process that EPA now no longer deems relevant. It has cursorily dismissed documents leaked to the public that show obvious disagreement among the agencies in the Executive Branch over the scientific and legal implications of an endangerment finding. And, by issuing a formal notice that it intends to promulgate a Section 202(a)-based tailpipe GHG emissions rule, it has clearly prejudged the issue of endangerment and has therefore turned the Proposal comment period into a complete charade.


6 posted on 01/11/2010 11:33:58 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

do you happen to have a link? can’t open this one


7 posted on 01/11/2010 11:34:39 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER ( EPA will rule your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney


TRANSLATED FROM GOVERNMENT SPEAK:
The bribes for granting exceptions to the phony carbon taxing scheme belong to members of Congress not some bureaucrat at the EPA. Hands off our slush fund!
8 posted on 01/11/2010 11:35:36 AM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Great, they introduced legislation, he will get hundreds of co-sponsors.

However, how many of them will sign the discharge petition forcing this to the floor for a vote?

9 posted on 01/11/2010 11:40:48 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Demand Constitutionality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

“Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D-ND) introduced legislation on Friday that would prohibit the agency from implementing national greenhouse gas emissions standards. In his press release, Congressman Pomeroy said.”

So why haven’t our snoozing Republican’s done this already?


11 posted on 01/11/2010 11:44:54 AM PST by Dem Guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I’m not really fond of promoting a democrat, but on this issue, he is promoting our national interest.

Congressman Earl Pomeroy today announced introduction of H.R. 4396, the Save Our Energy Jobs Act, legislation which would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gases. This legislation has been introduced in response to a recent EPA announcement that it was moving forward on new rules to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. This action, if not prevented, could dramatically increase energy rates as well as end up costing North Dakota jobs.

http://www.pomeroy.house.gov/


16 posted on 01/11/2010 12:06:14 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

North Dakota is an energy producing state in addition to agriculture. Our boy Pomeroy is just trying to hold onto his job here, but it won’t work - he’ll be replaced by a Republican that will vote in his constituents’ interest all the time as opposed to only in election years.


17 posted on 01/11/2010 12:21:45 PM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the current provisions of the Clean Air Act is irresponsible and just plain wrong. That is why I introduced the Save Our Energy Jobs Act which would stop the EPA from moving forward with its proposal.

A better title might be “Don’t Regulate Us Until We are a Third World Nation Act”

20 posted on 01/11/2010 12:51:05 PM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney; IrishCatholic; mmanager; enough_idiocy; FreedomPoster; carolinablonde; proud_yank; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

22 posted on 01/11/2010 1:03:40 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Freedom from fat cat greedy Big Government tyranny IS a Right ... It IS the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
D0000MAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

No sign of global warming as Miami hits all-time record low

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

24 posted on 01/11/2010 6:19:27 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Don't eat your dog; eat obnoxious, liberal humans to save the planet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

This won’t pass. Even the RAT sponsors will eventually get bought off.


26 posted on 01/11/2010 7:20:37 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Copenhagen Climate Summit; Shovel Ready)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

The problem with any legislation is that, even if Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid were to let it through (highly unlikely), the Kenyan Clown would still certainly veto it. There’s no way that any bill like this is going to muster 2/3s in both the House and Senate for an override of an Obama veto.


27 posted on 01/11/2010 7:32:23 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson