[ChessExpert]

I took a quick look at the linked site and was favorably impressed by his emphasis on nuclear power and offshore oil production.

[FreeStateYank]

Reading Graham’s letter, it was clear to me that he wasn’t going to deal with the AGW claims, but propose common-sense proposals for energy independence.

I can live with that. Once we are on the way to telling ‘those who don’t like us very much’ to get stuffed, the hoax aspects of AGW claims can be investigated. Fully. With clawbacks and jail time as appropriate.

[ThePatriotsFlag]

I took a quick look at the linked site and was favorably impressed by his emphasis on nuclear power and offshore oil production.

---

Of course you were favorably impressed, he pushed the conservative buttons ... said the right things. I said it was "well-written." The problem is he wants to do this as a PART OF CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION! We can do this WITHOUT giving our country to the likes of Algore!

Would you be in favor of this if he'd written:

We Need to have nuclear power
We Need to Drill Here Drill Now
And we'll attach it to a bill that gives Obama 4 terms.

Sure the first two sound fine and will "favorably impress" you ... its that troublesome 3rd one ... the "other" thing to which the "good" things are being attached. Also with the promises you seen from this congress and administration ... would you trust them to honor nuclear power and drilling? Did you trust them when they said the Health Care bill would be transparent with C-Span broadcasting it?

Bottom line

(1) There is no man made global warming, the sun causes it to come and go and even Democrats can't legislate the sun's activity.

(2) We do not need "climate change" legislation because CO2 "pollution" is part of the myth.

And to give Senator Graham the "ok" to move forward with the likes of John Kerry to create a huge tax on corporations, small businesses and individual taxpayers borders on criminal conspiracy!

---

The Patriot's Flag - Graham on Climate Change