Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

I was born in Boston (no question about that) in 1936. I have a copy of the the COB, signed in 1969. It states the hospital I was born in, the doctor in attendance, and my mother and father’s names.

It does not include the fact that my father was born in Norway and was not a citizen at the time of my birth.

It does state that my mother was 17.

Question: Am I a natural born citizen?


44 posted on 01/06/2010 10:48:15 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: norge

Natural born citizen status only matters if you’re running for vpotus or potus.

“Question: Am I a natural born citizen?”

No.


47 posted on 01/06/2010 10:52:41 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Well, we didn't get dressed up for nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: norge

Based on the following, if your father owed allegiance to any foreign sovereignty, then no you would not be a “natural born citizen” for the purpose of determining your eligibility to run for Vice President or President of the United States.

“Bingham states: I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen… . . – John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866”


51 posted on 01/06/2010 10:58:10 PM PST by WVPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: norge

NO


74 posted on 01/07/2010 6:38:47 AM PST by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: norge; Ramius
See post #27 above ... in my opinion, you are not a natural born citizen based upon what you posted. In post #27, you will see how the principle framer of the 14th Amendment defined 'natural born citizen'. The dissonance the obamanoids and their confused audience is nothing more than ignoring the actual historical data available in favor of believing what they want to be the truth but what has yet to be settled for pres and v. pres by a SCOTUS ruling.

The obamanoids have conflated so much at this point, it is nearly impossible to change the confused perspective of some. We may see that the SCOTUS--if they ever rule on the term--will, as activist judges, also ignore the historical data such as listed in post #27 above, and make up a new definition along the lines of the deceit the obamanoids are pushing. We shall perhaps see, but don't hold your breath for that one, since the criminal enterprise party is now firmly ensconced as heads of the federal oligarchy ... even judge Roberts bows to their power.

80 posted on 01/07/2010 9:24:17 AM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson