when there is no definition of an original term in any legal system, the law inevitably fills in the gap. They don’t just do it on a whim, and that becomes what it meant. I don’t see a single competent legal source outside the core birther community who has any doubt that Obama is a NBC. That would seem to include Chief Justice Roberts, who swore Obama in and presumably knows something about the Constitution.
Where do you guys get this dangerous idea?
Whatever the current congress thinks the constitution means or should mean is under their direct control?
What if you don’t agree with some future congress and they make changes you think are crazy, is that still the law of the land?
Just think about what you are saying?
I can’t tell if you’re for real or if you’re just trolling.