you are quick to judge, are you not?
your quickness is rash.
no further need to give commodious explanations as to the author’s moral integrity.
suffice it to say that the author and this family have known one another for thirty years, therefore, it would be not out of place for the author to make such a request of friends who are actually extended family over years.
please, don’t be so quick to make a cold judgment as you have done. it is not logical and it is not kind.
I didn’t think it was so strange, except that he could’ve waited. Sometimes someone else is already on the other computer(s)
Actually, I agree with the previous poster. My family has been friends with another family for about 15 years. I think my husband has had legitimate reason to enter the teenaged girl's bedroom one time. We had gifted her with birthday money used to redecorate her room. We looked at her room together. I think one time I went into the kids' rooms to look for my son's shoes. I've been in the parents bedroom once, to see their newly bought bedroom furniture. We don't generally go in other people's bedrooms.
It's creepy.
I am the father of a preteen daughter. If I'm too slow to judge, I could quickly become a father of a victim.
your quickness is rash.
My quickness is justified!
no further need to give commodious explanations as to the author’s moral integrity.
The first seven paragraphs of this article could just as well follow the title; PROTECTING YOUR CHILD FROM VISITING PREDATORS
suffice it to say that the author and this family have known one another for thirty years, therefore, it would be not out of place for the author to make such a request of friends who are actually extended family over years.
The author failed to mention anything about exact number of years he had been such a close friend of the family. For that matter, he also fails to mention how many times he has been in this 12 year old girl's bedroom or on her computer.
please, don’t be so quick to make a cold judgment as you have done. it is not logical and it is not kind.
Now that I have taken a few minutes to review some of J. Grant Swank, Jr.'s other articles, I have to say I'm shocked that he would take on a subject of this nature so carelessly and with little or no regard to those of us he is directing it to. The first seven paragraphs of his article are anything but ingratiating to a protective parent who doesn't know the author.