Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385; sickoflibs; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker
First you argue against ideological purity, and then you argue for it. No. You are fabricating.

Do you have any clue... Ad hominem, if you can't attack the position attack the person. Nice.

Let me make this clear ... demands a set of core beliefs and strict adherence.... Some political parties have successfully enforced strict adherence to the party such as USSR Communist Party, Chinese Communist Party, Nazi Party, and their kin.

More precisely, political parties must find unity in a common purpose... Agreed, but not to the point of strict adherence to the party line.

The upcoming elections must not be simply about regaining a Republican majority...The United States has already been permanently altered...by Republicans and Democrats alike. Agreed, but another round of Democrat control may be the coup d'gras

The Democrats have a common purpose. Disagree. Democrats are a big tent party of different interests. The Party Enforcers make the congressmen follow the party line, mostly.

28 posted on 01/01/2010 1:14:08 PM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: ricks_place; rabscuttle385; sickoflibs; mkjessup

“Some political parties have successfully enforced strict adherence to the party such as USSR Communist Party, Chinese Communist Party, Nazi Party, and their kin.”

Well now Rabs, they finally got ya. You are....

A) A member of the politboro

B) A Chi-Com

C) A Nazi

D) A&B

E) All of the above


29 posted on 01/01/2010 1:22:16 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson