Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny

I thought Downey’s Holmes was a bit too slovenly, with his “House” five-day beard, tattered clothes, and incredibly filthy apartment. In fact, the film made London look like a horribly filthy place, which perhaps it was in those days.


23 posted on 01/22/2010 10:46:52 PM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

Holmes?

24 posted on 01/22/2010 10:50:26 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle
Yes, that was ONE thing about Downey's portrayal that was not in keeping with Doyle's Holmes. The real (!) Holmes was as tidy as a cat, and even when camping out in the Moor in "Hound of the Baskervilles" managed always to have a clean collar and cuffs; he'd never have had a three-day growth of beard!

As for the filthy apartment ... in the written stories, Holmes was pretty much a slob. London was never described overall as being awful and filthy, but I read a bio of Conan Dolyle, who was origially from Edinburgh, Scotland. Doyle was very happy to leave that city because it was absolutely horrid, filthy, and grim.

25 posted on 01/22/2010 11:23:27 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson