Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Scanian
And the New York Times is mystified as to motivation: "What led a worldly young man, who had studied at an elite British university, to choose suicidal violence?" Islam just never occurs to the erudite reporters and editors at our major news organizations. How long till we are treated to the meme that Abdulmutallab was simply a confused young man in need of psychological evaluation and counseling?
I know I've answered this question myself many times over the past 9 years but I'm going to ask it again, just to see what others think:

Obviously the leftists who run and write for the Slimes are not Muslims. What do they think they are accomplishing by shielding Islam from any criticism? What is their motivation?

I know the obvious answer: leftists hate everything to do with America, the success of America, the power of America, the liberties and freedoms of average Americans, so Islam is their ally against all those things.

But is that all there is to it? Is there something we're missing here?

2 posted on 12/27/2009 4:11:42 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
"What do they think they are accomplishing by shielding Islam from any criticism? What is their motivation?"

Beside the obvious answer, they're probably afraid of getting sued out of business by the aclu, cair, and other clubs who grovel easterly towards mecca.

5 posted on 12/27/2009 4:17:27 AM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman

The terrorist’s father had denounced him as a nut-job earlier and left an open record of his suspicions. Coupled with FBI records, the usual leftist tack of overlooking this assault as an aberrant case would’ve been embarrassing to the credibility of the administration now in power. Instead, this is one Islamofascist attack that will be correctly labeled in order to keep the sheep confident that Islam’s premier son is doing his best to protect America from radical Islam (ITAO?). The kneepadist media, as usual, are simply watching from their posture at the waist level perspective as the story unfolds itself.


6 posted on 12/27/2009 4:21:55 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman
But is that all there is to it? Is there something we're missing here?

Yes, to a liberal monies spent on security is a waste CIA, FBI DoD etc. (them)They' re nothing but a bunch of nazis anyway and bust dope smokers to boot.

Get it? No threat, no money need be spent on security. The world is happy and lovely, no terrorism. That money can and should be spent on slutty welfare queens...(/them)Get it?

9 posted on 12/27/2009 4:36:21 AM PST by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman

I don’t think the media hates America, but they have a different vision of the way the world works than most of us here. That vision and the Obama vision are close to one another, and I beleve the media is waitng for a lead from the administration as to how to play this latest terrorist attack. It starts with what to call it officially.

They are both more concerned with the style than the substance, and in dangerous world that is a serious problem for all.


11 posted on 12/27/2009 6:06:06 AM PST by JeanLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson