But would you admit that there might be evidence in all the 'records' that Obama has directed to be 'sealed'? Evidence that could contradict more than just his birthplace?
There is a document released by the state of Hawaii, confirmed by the Republican Governor of the state plus a hospital that Obama says and the White House says he was born in that has not been contradicted by that hospital.
Then you just don't understand the implications of a Presidential Order to keep certain information sealed. IF the BC contained info that would counter the President's claims, they are not 'at liberty' to acknowledge the fact. This means, they are permitted (and ordered) by law to lie to the public.
Plus birth announcements in the local newspapers at the time.
That may be the only accurate info we are being given. That is, as long as that wasn't professionally altered. Obama has friends in high places and all it takes is lots of money, and he had tons of it.
Bottom line: We know we aren't being open access to the truth. Records other than the BC are being withheld, why?
I really don’t see why we have to continue with this stupidity
When you get that feeling, it's God's way of telling you not to post. Posting on a thread increases it's 'hit' count, and keeps it higher on the Forum Boards.
Frankly, I find it refreshing, and educational, to debate the subject with those of a contrary opinion.
Don't you?
You can’t debate a conspiracy theory. This stuff is just as looney as the crap we saw on the left about Bush or 9/11.
I can only give you the facts as known. I can’t answer what you believe are alterior motives of hospitals and Republican Governors. I can only tell you what they said and the facts as they are currently known.