[tired_old_conservative]

“Try to study the issue before spouting off. He is not NBC and is not eligible. This is why they are covering it. You DU Dummy.”

Well, I've studied your belligerent, one-sentence insistence that what you want to believe is undeniable fact. It wasn't really all that compelling.

I have consistently read all the links people provide on these cases. I have even commented on the source material itself numerous times. It is not compelling or proof of anything. Some of it is almost clever. The rest ranges from incompetent hack work to clearly deranged.

[Canadian Outrage]

You have consistently studied all the links blah blah blah AND YOU have still come to the wrong conclusion because you are an Obamabot you poor thing. You have my sincere sympathy. You are NO Conservative, either old or tired. CO

[danamco]

I have even commented on the source material itself numerous times.

numerous times???

It would be more correct if you say:!

"I have even commented on the source material itself more than two-hundred and ten (210) times in less than three (3) months on this issue, and ONLY on this issue alone"!!

And as a a tired_old_conservative'(?) I have NOT contributed on any other issues or other thread here on F.R!!!

[Canadian Outrage]

You sir are NOT compelling either. In fact, quite the opposite, your excuse makaing is particularly obvious!! CO

[danamco]

Hey oldie; how many post are you up to now on the B.C.+ issues ONLY, 225???