Skip to comments.
Gibbs Cites al-Qaeda’s Criticism Of Gitmo As A Reason To Close It
Flopping Aces ^
| 12-16-09
| Alec Rawls
Posted on 12/16/2009 7:59:50 PM PST by Starman417
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Starman417
What a bunch of Nancy boys.
To: Starman417
The current administration is listening to Al Qaida while ignoring American legal citizens?
3
posted on
12/16/2009 8:03:57 PM PST
by
lonestar
(Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
To: Starman417
Wait!.... Al Qaeda’s opinion holds more sway than American’s opinions?
4
posted on
12/16/2009 8:10:17 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: Starman417
I pounced. ...and then I pounced again.
Great googally moogally!
Gibbs=0
5
posted on
12/16/2009 8:11:27 PM PST
by
Eddie01
To: Starman417
Can one of the clowns in the White House tell us what AQ used for recruiting for all of the terror attacks between the first WTC bombing in 1993 and the 2nd in 2001?
6
posted on
12/16/2009 8:12:20 PM PST
by
G Larry
(DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
To: Vendome
"Al Qaedas opinion holds more sway than Americans opinions?"It would seem so. But what the hell. Obama has more in common with muslims, communists and socialists than he does with us.
7
posted on
12/16/2009 8:16:22 PM PST
by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
To: Hang'emAll
Well thank goodness we’re moving Gitmo to a place where al-Qaeda won’t hate us.
/sarcasm
8
posted on
12/16/2009 8:33:28 PM PST
by
baltoga
To: Starman417
What next? Organized crime criticizes LE agencies, so we eliminate them???
9
posted on
12/16/2009 8:41:10 PM PST
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
To: Starman417
Well if we just closed Gitmo Al Queda just wouldn’t want to harm us anymore! What’s that? They attacked us half dozen times BEFORE Gitmo was used to house terrorists?
10
posted on
12/16/2009 8:41:39 PM PST
by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: Starman417; OldDeckHand
There was a congressman on Fox a day or so ago who said 'We're not closing Guantanamo, we're moving it'.
Moving it to the US gives the captured terrorists rights and gives their lawyers objections to their incarceration under Habeas Corpus.
I need a lawyer!
11
posted on
12/16/2009 8:52:08 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress!)
To: BIGLOOK
Can one of the clowns in the White House tell us what AQ used for recruiting for all of the terror attacks between the first WTC bombing in 1993 and the 2nd in 2001?
I know a good one, they used Iraq as a recruiting tool. While Clinton was President. They said the sanctions against Sadam was killing their fellow moozlims through starvation and lack of medicine. I remember it.
To: Starman417
Thirty-two times since 2001 and four times this year alone, senior Al Qaida leadership in recruiting videos have used the prison at Guantanamo Bay as a clarion call to bring extremists from around the world to join their effort. Will they just dub the name of the new Illinois prison where they had said Gitmo, or will they refilm the entire scene to include the new name? Or will they love us forever now that we will move the prison a couple thousand miles north?
13
posted on
12/16/2009 9:05:53 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Gore is the fifth horseman of the apocalypse. He rides an icy horse bringing cold wherever he goes.)
To: KarlInOhio
Gibbs Cites al-Qaedas Criticism Of Gitmo As A Reason To Close It But..but al Qaeda also criticized Abu Bama. Why don't we fire him?
14
posted on
12/16/2009 9:08:32 PM PST
by
melancholy
(Stop USA change, destroy the 0b0z0ne layer!)
To: ccruse456
I think you meant to direct that to G Larry.
Your point is good but you left out the chemical weapons Saddam used on the Kurds.
15
posted on
12/16/2009 9:09:24 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress!)
To: BIGLOOK
"Moving it to the US gives the captured terrorists rights and gives their lawyers objections to their incarceration under Habeas Corpus." Actually, the Hamdi and Hamdan decisions of 2004 and 2006, respectively, made the location of the enemy combatants moot. The Supremes decided (wrongly IMHO) other things that enemy combatants are entitled to habeas review.
Essentially, SCOTUS has ruled that irrespective of where the enemy combatants are kept, they are never entirely out of the reach of the US Federal Courts. Of course, even beyond the legal reasons, there are other legitimate and substantive reasons why moving these prisoners to CONUS is a bad, bad idea.
To: BIGLOOK
Oops - I had a typo. That should have read...
"The Supremes decided (wrongly IMHO) that amongst other things, enemy combatants are entitled to habeas review."
To: Starman417
Of course it's a recruiting.
"and if you get captured by the Americans they will send you to a tropical paradise and feed you three times a day with plenty of food that even the prophet Mohammed would love...."
18
posted on
12/16/2009 9:19:20 PM PST
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: Starman417
lol, yeah, assuredly this administration is not letting terrorist dictate what we can and can not do, huh Gibbs?
19
posted on
12/16/2009 9:32:21 PM PST
by
cranked
To: Starman417
Hey! Gibbs!
Pull my finger.
20
posted on
12/16/2009 9:37:52 PM PST
by
YHAOS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson