Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: plenipotentiary
Psst. Judge Carter said the correct venue for this Quo Warranto was in DC.

Did he say that the President of the United States was subject to removal from office under the DC quo warranto statute? No. He just pointed out that, not being a judge for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, he had no jurisdiction over a case brought under the District of Columbia Code.

Should she ever wander that far East, she will lose in DC too.

72 posted on 12/16/2009 1:33:51 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Pilsner

Well. I see we disagree. Time will tell, and it’s not just Orly. Donofrio and the Chrysler Dealers are having a go.


73 posted on 12/16/2009 2:15:21 PM PST by plenipotentiary (Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth, passed to him via Pops, can't be NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson