[Natural Law]

"Net some thirty years or so, then he was one of the privileged academics who were. Can you attest to that, and on what venues,Natural Law?"

Reread my post. I didn't state that GGG had been posting on the internet for 30 years I said he had developed, published and posted over a three decade period. With comprehension skills like that it is no wonder you did so poorly at science.

[wendy1946]

When you took debating in highschool (before you dropped out), did they try to teach you anything beyond character assassination or making bad guesses at forum posters' IDs??

[YHAOS]

“Reread my post.”

Follow your own advice. Besides the ‘Net, I specifically inquired “what publications and other venues,” since you seemed rather vague, stumbling all over the place. Now, in trying to avoid the question and in trying to play the big Alpha hoo-haw in this place, you’ve managed to call into question your own reading comprehension. You’ve kicked up a lot of dust and made a lot of noise, but other than that, all you’ve done is make yourself look petty and foolish.

But, if that’s the best you can do . . .

[metmom]

I didn't state that GGG had been posting on the internet for 30 years I said he had developed, published and posted over a three decade period.

No you didn't. What you posted was THIS.....

You see, GGG is involved in a self declared war with real science because it has rejected his crack pot theories developed, published, and posted over a nearly 30 year stint under many, many names, accounts, and net IDs.

You clearly included accounts and net ID's. Those are internet specific.

It's not our reading comprehension. If you want to be understood, you need to express yourself more clearly.