“When will your peer-reviewed paper be appearing?”
Ah, I see you’ve bought the “peer-reviewed” Kool Aid. So sorry.
Wonder who “peer-reviewed” Newton, Galileo, the Wright brothers—oh that’s right, while the Wright brothers were flying around the “peer-reviewed” academic scientists were still publishing papers proving heavier-than-air human flight was impossible.
Global-warming science is “peer-reviewed”. I have absolutely no interest in the opinion or approval of my “peers” whom I regard as mostly fools—how many of them have bought into global-warming and every leftist idea in the world?
Hank
Oops. That’s going to put you on the outs with the self-declared defenders of science.
I’ve made comments like that and gotten shredded for it.
Peer review is a sacred cow in spite of things like Climategate and the Bogdanov Affair.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogdanov_Affair
If you're putting yourself in the same class with those boys, then you've problems that far out weigh your inability to demonstrate that you have no bias.
"Global-warming science is “peer-reviewed”. I have absolutely no interest in the opinion or approval of my “peers” whom I regard as mostly fools—how many of them have bought into global-warming and every leftist idea in the world?"
You ought to feel right at home with this last bunch you mention. You can't back up what you say either.