Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

It’s pointless for a two-bit pol like Hunter to endorse another two-bit pol like Huckabee in the first place.
When Reagan endorsed Ford, it was to bring the party together after a hard fought campaign. Same for when Romney endorsed McCain. These are cases of the runner-up getting behind his party’s chosen nominee once the race is over.

But when a nobody like Hunter drops out a few weeks into the race to endorse another longshot like Huckleberry, it serves no purpose other than for the drop to stroke his own ego and pretend like his opinion matters.

Unlike Reagan endorsing Ford, Hunter endorsing Huckleberry had nothing to do with helping his party win the Whitehouse. It was just an insignificant politician’s vain attempt at influencing the outcome of an intraparty race.


37 posted on 12/10/2009 2:34:45 PM PST by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: counterpunch

Funny. Why did Tancredo endorse Flipper? Why did Fred run McQueeg’s 2000 campaign? Why did DeMint endorse flipper early on? Why did Bolton and Brownback endorse McCain? Why did Hannity fellate Giuliani?

But more importantly, why did you repeatedly endorse the idea that Tancredo is a nazi and Edwards is a libertarian?

I’d guess the answer to that is that you are young and stupid still. But that would be an insult to the young and stupid.


38 posted on 12/10/2009 2:41:11 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson