To: Shellybenoit
Stop calling these charlatans “scientists.”
2 posted on
12/06/2009 1:51:55 PM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Shellybenoit
Did they use the same trees they glued the black moths on, to prove D’winism?
3 posted on
12/06/2009 1:59:30 PM PST by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:31 Behold, I am against you," O " you most proud, said the said the Lord GOD of hosts)
To: Shellybenoit
Future Federal Inmate Number 564438 Michael Mann with some of his faked tree rings:
4 posted on
12/06/2009 2:03:14 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
To: Shellybenoit
5 posted on
12/06/2009 2:18:53 PM PST by
Huskrrrr
To: Shellybenoit
6 posted on
12/06/2009 2:21:48 PM PST by
IYellAtMyTV
(Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
To: Shellybenoit
I’ve been using the expression “What are you, a climatologist?” for anyone who is making up the “facts”.
8 posted on
12/06/2009 2:33:09 PM PST by
brad blank
(New Retort)
To: Shellybenoit
9 posted on
12/06/2009 2:48:55 PM PST by
VOA
(I)
To: Shellybenoit
When a so called “scientist” qualifies his expertise with “climate,” he is a liar. Real scientists are skeptical of global warming. So, when you see a headline that reads something like this, “Skeptics challenge climate scientists...,” it means, “Real scientists challenge frauds.”
10 posted on
12/06/2009 3:41:32 PM PST by
pallis
To: Shellybenoit
Thank God for the Telegraph. They’ve been all over this story from the beginning. Jeez, if we were waiting for an American news source to keep us informed on this event we’d be SOL.
Yet this is a Eurowienie newspaper. How does that work?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
