Thank you for the definitions, Jean S! I have already apologized for my mistake. Where "Truthers" appears in the article, the word should have been "Birthers."
The fact of the matter is, I don't pay much attention to either Truthers or Birthers. All I was trying to suggest is that people who think that proof of birth in Hawaii is sufficient to establish the natural-born status of BHO are mistaken.
If I had anything to say about them, it would be this:
I consider Truthers totally insane, out of their minds. In the olden days, you'd find people like this on psychiatric wards. But we don't lock up crazy people anymore. :^)
Birthers, on the other hand, are on to something real but are mistaken in their fundamental premise.
I hope this will clear up any outstanding issues between us, Jean S. Thank you so much for writing!
Thank you so much for all of your insights, dearest sister in Christ!