Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop

However for the following to be true, there needs to be one other part of the formula - JURISDICTION!

The mexican anchor baby, still would not have JURISDICTION, as it’s parents are under Mexican law.


59 posted on 12/05/2009 6:40:02 PM PST by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: syc1959; Alamo-Girl; TXnMA
However for the following to be true, there needs to be one other part of the formula — JURISDICTION! The mexican anchor baby, still would not have JURISDICTION, as it’s parents are under Mexican law.

A most astute insight, syc1959!

The Fourteenth Amendment says:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.... [bold itals added: There are TWO criteria to be satisfied here, as you so astutely note syc1959.]

Question: How can a minor tyke born on American soil to non-U.S.-citizen parents be "under the jurisdiction of the United States?" As a minor, the child is under the (natural law) jurisdiction of its parents — who owe their principal allegiance to a foreign nation/state and are therefore not themselves subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

It seems the Fourteenth Amendment, with its jus solis doctrine, has vastly complicated the citizenship issue! JMHO, FWIW.

Thank you so much for your great observation, syc1959!

96 posted on 12/07/2009 11:12:53 AM PST by betty boop (Malevolence wears the false face of honesty. — Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson