From the article:
“even if the birth certificate issue was legitimate, getting him removed from office for that reason would make him a victim in the eyes of many.”
The victims are the legitimate Americans who expect, make it “demand” that the Constitution be observed. As Washington so aptly said, “The Constitution is sacredly obligatory on all”.
As for the trash who threatens rioting if Obama were to be removed, they are easily controlled.
To continue, also from the article:
“It would be portrayed as undoing the election based on a technicality.”
The Constitution is hardly a “technicality”. The Constitution is what defines us, what makes us unique among all nations that are or have ever been.
Now, it is time to address the sedition and the treason inherent in the article’s argument. Underlying the whine of the article is the author’s cowardly fear of the communism inspired rabble rioting in his urban habitat:
“There would be rioting in the streets and likely calls for a constitutional convention.”
Such riots could easily be dealt with, assuming they ever reached any significant size. Urban black criminals, Black Muslims and illegals from Mexico are concentrated in a few urban areas where they are easily isolated and controlled.
Unlike the author, I believe that the large majority of people in America would not tolerate rioting were Obama to be discovered to be illegally elected to office.
“The Constitution is sacredly obligatory on all”.
Most in America do believe this. They can easily deal with those who don’t.
The Secretary of State of Hawaii has certified with a COLB, the Obama was born in that state making him a verified US citizen. There was no such thing as a government issued Birth Certificate when the Constitution was written and ratified, therefore demanding this document has nothing to do with a COnstitutional mandate.