Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
"That said, I'm well aware of the definition games that evos play. "

I gave you the clue but you remain clueless. Start with Phylogenetic Taxonomy and Morphological Data Matrices. I don't care how "evos" define transitional species, I just want to know how you do so that we can share a common starting point.

287 posted on 12/05/2009 9:02:40 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law; editor-surveyor; Gordon Greene

In this post, you were criticizing e-s for not being able to define what a transitional species was.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2400239/posts?page=307#307

So, I asked you, or challenged you, to provide a better one.

As of yet, you have not. You just threw it back to me and refused to answer like you have all the other questions you’ve been asked.

Much like other evos on these threads, now that I think about it....


288 posted on 12/05/2009 9:11:43 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

To: Natural Law

“Start with Phylogenetic Taxonomy and Morphological Data Matrices. “

That’s just evo-athiest brainwashing! Real Christians use baraminology (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baramin).


290 posted on 12/05/2009 10:01:38 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson