Replies

Until she actually rebukes the “pathway to citizenship” crap, she has not shut up anybody. This interview mirrors some of what she told Univision last year during that interview.

Garbage!

She did not say she was for the "Pathway to Citizenship", she just did not answer that portion of the question clearly.

She said there needs to be a fence on the border to keep future illegals out and that if they are not going to follow the rules, they need to get out.

Like I said before, I am 100% sure she will clear up the ambiguity as OZero attempts to roll out his Amnesty program.

Quit trying to put words in her mouth she didn't say.

Like I said before, I am 100% sure she will clear up the ambiguity as OZero attempts to roll out his Amnesty program.

She's had several occasions over the last year in which to clear up the ambiguity. She deliberately chooses not to.

She did not say she was for the "Pathway to Citizenship", she just did not answer that portion of the question clearly.

I went back and looked up the interview. In response to the question:

To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?

She said:

I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.

That interview is now 13 months old and she has never refuted her support for a pathway to citizenship. You can claim that she was being ambiguous or that she was forced to say that by Juan McAmnesty, and I'll even support you to an extent given what I know of the campaign, but she's been free and clear of the campaign for a year now and has had ample opportunities in dozens of interviews to come out one way or the other.

I'm like you, I want potential leaders to be honest with the American public about their stances on important issues.