You would think, if there were dozens of posters that supposedly got zapped merely for disagreeing, they could come up with one or two names, eh?
So if I can show you one recent incident of someone “disagreeing” and getting banned, you’ll agree that there can be, even if unevenly applied, a litmus test for posters at FR?
Kinda seeming like the liberals claims about the tea parties just being a bunch of racists. They don't back up the claim, but they just keep repeating it, as if repetition alone makes something true.