“The real problem was the California liberal medical community abusing the law and basically encouraging women to have an abortion.”
Isn’t that what I said?
Again, I’m not advocating Romney I’m arguing whether pols can have epiphanies on controversial issues.
Yes, but you also threw in a cheap pot shot at Reagan that serves no good purpose. And you know it! Again, Reagan didn't allow anything. The "opening" you speak of was taken by the liberal health care providers who just happened to also be the power brokers who ran the medical business in California.
Romney's epiphany on the abortion issue came in the same time frame he made the decision to run for potus. Obviously, a political metamorphosis based more on political expediency than conservative principle.
The fact that Romney continually has flipped on many issues over the years, should be a major factor in not supporting him for any elected position. Just look at the videos in my reply at post #127. If Romney wanted the support of pro-life conservatives, he should had his epiphany 10-15 years ago, not on the eve of his presidential run. Romney remains a first class phony.