Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J; nmh
Let me get this straight. Reagan signed pro-abort lgislation into law and then later said he made a mistake and had learned from it. But if anyone running against Palin has the same epiphany they are RINO’s that need to be run out of town on a rail?

Reagan signed what was meant as very limited and targeted abortion legalization legislation for instances where the health of the mother was in danger. Doctors abused that provision, and Reagan learned from it and later said he regretted signing the legislation as a result.

Romney supported legal abortion demand - including minors being able to get an abortion without parental notification or consent - as he campaigned in 1994 and 2002.

If you can't grasp the difference, I can't help you.

119 posted on 12/02/2009 10:06:11 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

And you answered a question that wasn’t asked. The issue is can a politician have an epiphany and change/modify their position on abortion? At one time Reagan thought it was okay if the health of the mother was at risk. Later he changed that to only the most extreme cases where the life of the mother was in danger.

But the opening he allowed by signing that original legislation resulted in the deaths of millions of babies.

I’m not saying Reagan was pro-choice, he was ADAMANTLY pro life. But pols make mistakes and sometimes they have to live with the political consequences.

And sometimes they don’t.


149 posted on 12/02/2009 10:18:47 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson