Which part is bashing? Gives her some advice, but says she has a better chance than the rest...
The author of the article is no friend of Sarah’s, to say the least.
Leaving the author’s biases aside, it’s also not well reasoned. For example, the author argues that Obama and Palin would continue the policies of big banks and big business begun under W. Then a paragraph or so later, the author argues that Romney, who made his bones in the venture capital world, is the path forward for the GOP. Any author that can’t see this disconnect isn’t worth reading.
Jack
"Palin is indeed rogue in the sense that she will be attempting to win national office while being widely condemned and criticized across the spectrum in the world of politics. She attempts to spin this as a positive, as though her ideas are too rogue for the world of politics. However, the reason she is mocked is because she is tragically incompetent and embarrassing for those informed on the issues."
What do you call that, if not bashing?
I guess you missed this part:
"She attempts to spin this as a positive, as though her ideas are too rogue for the world of politics. However, the reason she is mocked is because she is tragically incompetent and embarrassing for those informed on the issues."