[Dr. Sivana]

How about the famous poster of the French revolution, with a lady at the head, storming the barricades?

If you are thinking of "Liberty Leading the People," two problems. One, the lady in question is a bit to plump to be Sarah. Two, at least one of her mammaries are in full view. It might work for fine art, but it cheapens the governor.

[wildandcrazyrussian]

I was unaware of that since I haven’t seen it for years, but clearly that is an inessential and photoshoppable detail !

[elcid1970]

I was a kid when I first saw Liberty Leading the People and thought, they’re not following her into battle, they just wanna catch up with her!

Anyway, if Sarah is so marginal and useless to the Republicans according to the pundits, why do the libs ceaselessly beat up on her?

Eugene Robinson’s latest screed is particularily offensive: he compares Sarah to Evita Peron, showing his own blinkered stuipidity as he does so. I mean, when Evita was Sarah’s age, she had already been dead for more than a decade! Evita slept her way to the top, Sarah will campaign her way to the top. Evita hated children and wanted none of her own, and Sarah epitomizes genuine motherhood through her family.

Liberals like Robinson are either stupid or arrogant. No other qualities are visible.