Skip to comments.
Some parts at 20 degrees Kelvin and Other at Room Temperature and the Whole Wire still Superconducts
Next Big Future ^
| November 26, 2009
| Brian Wang
Posted on 11/27/2009 2:45:38 PM PST by decimon
>
For this to work, the wire's surface must be extremely clean, allowing electrons to move freely and spread along the wire to create a uniform temperature. A material with a critical temperature of -193 °C could superconduct at room temperature, provided some sections were kept to -253 °C, they found. In principle, the colder these refrigeration points are, the fewer you need, Dubi says.
>
(Excerpt) Read more at nextbigfuture.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: stringtheory; superconductivity; superconductor; superconducts; wire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
11/27/2009 2:45:39 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
2
posted on
11/27/2009 2:51:29 PM PST
by
Krodg
To: Krodg
You needn’t supercool the entire wire to achieve superconduction.
3
posted on
11/27/2009 2:55:08 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
They have calculated but has been shown to work?
4
posted on
11/27/2009 3:01:40 PM PST
by
allmost
To: decimon
is that worth anything without fusion powering it?
5
posted on
11/27/2009 3:05:11 PM PST
by
omega4179
(0 is an embarrassment to us all.)
To: allmost
The claim is that no disruption of the suppressive effects at low temps occurs when the temp is increased. Considering this is an innate state of the conducting material itself I'm highly skeptical.
6
posted on
11/27/2009 3:11:32 PM PST
by
allmost
To: allmost
They have calculated but has been shown to work?Not yet tested.
7
posted on
11/27/2009 3:18:27 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
The claim that suppression of the b-field extends beyond the superconductive matter and is somehow ‘projected’ throughout is astounding. The article could be a bit longer. ;)
8
posted on
11/27/2009 3:21:21 PM PST
by
allmost
To: allmost
The article says:
“According to Yonatan Dubi and Massimiliano Di Ventra of the University of California, San Diego. They have calculated that provided some points along the wire's length stay below the threshold temperature, the material will superconduct.”
It might have something to do with frequency. As you might know, at DC, electricity fills the entire cross-section of the wire. However, as the frequency increases, the electrons move farther away from the center of the wire. It is known as the skin effect and is the result of eddy currents in the wire. Now if the areas where most of the eddy currents are found are kept at a lower temperature, you might be able to achieve superconduction in those areas. Just a guess.
9
posted on
11/27/2009 3:22:38 PM PST
by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless, indisputable, and unambiguous clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
To: allmost
This sounds to me like the opposite of “supercooling” - where you can actually have liquid water below 32 degrees F, as long as it’s extremely pure and undisturbed. Dropping a flake of dust or shaking it can cause it to almost instantly freeze. Interesting in a lab, but not very useful.
10
posted on
11/27/2009 3:25:28 PM PST
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
To: DennisR
The temperature difference and hence the superconductivity of the intermittent matter sounds physically impossible. 20 Kelvin adjacent to room temperature? Not with this level of technology.
11
posted on
11/27/2009 3:26:51 PM PST
by
allmost
To: The Antiyuppie
B-field suppression threshhold is far more extreme than a few degrees at our current level of knowledge. I’d like to read more. Curious now...
12
posted on
11/27/2009 3:31:34 PM PST
by
allmost
To: decimon
You neednt supercool the entire wire to achieve superconduction. Amazing! If it is corroborated a whole new level of electronics....
13
posted on
11/27/2009 3:40:42 PM PST
by
higgmeister
( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
To: allmost
The New Scientist article is too short. If you’re really ambitious, there’s a link to the publication with the paper.
14
posted on
11/27/2009 3:44:37 PM PST
by
decimon
To: higgmeister
At face value, the assertions are revolutionary.
15
posted on
11/27/2009 3:45:02 PM PST
by
allmost
To: higgmeister
Amazing! If it is corroborated a whole new level of electronics.... I was thinking electronics more than power transmission. If it applies.
16
posted on
11/27/2009 3:46:43 PM PST
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
Maybe a ping list?
17
posted on
11/27/2009 4:04:15 PM PST
by
allmost
To: allmost; SunkenCiv
SunkenCiv has been busy discovering his inner Pict.
18
posted on
11/27/2009 4:33:16 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
19
posted on
11/27/2009 4:34:55 PM PST
by
allmost
To: allmost
Sounds painful.You don't feel a thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2395530/posts?page=22
20
posted on
11/27/2009 4:57:02 PM PST
by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson