I’m sorry, I am not willing to buy into the theory that Dick Cheney intentionally failed to call for objections and that not a single Republican member of the House and Senate was prohibited from objecting to the certification of the election.
And, I do not believe that Chief Justice Roberts intentionally botched the Oath of Office. If Roberts had not wanted to deliver the Oath of Office, he could have refused to do the honors.
> Im sorry, I am not willing to buy into the theory ... You don't have to "buy into" anything! It is a FACT that NO objections were called for on Obama's Electoral votes by the U.S. Senate on Jan. 8, in accordance with REQUIREMENTS set forth in 3 USC 15 - Sec. 15:
You might say, "Oh, that just a technicality." But then again, so is the whole "Natural Born Citizen" issue merely a "technicality" in the eyes of some who don't hold it as a Constitutional requirement. Why else did Obama do a SECOND Oath of Office on Jan. 21? "Constitutional Experts" were concerned that other foreign governments and leaders might not acknowledge Obama's legitimacy, a/k/a, a "technicality."
Child molesters and murders are let off on weaker "technicalities" than this ...
|