Darwinism is a religious cult based in fantasy: as such it has no resemblance to anything having to do reality.
What we understand about the nature and history of the Universe, while incomplete, is made up of a network of billions of interdependent facts.
What one may understand about the history of the Universe one may only accurately understand as one chooses to pay attention to the One who tells of it, and He is the One Who was there at the beginning.
Anything else man physically studies is illuminated largely by mankind’s dimply lit and as you say, “incomplete” knowledge – and I might also add, command -- of the facts. Some of the incompleteness of knowledge of man springs from his unwillingness to believe the words of the Creator as He has seen fit to deliver them in His Scriptures.
There are two possibilities about what you believe is "Intelligent Design". Either God faked everything, ,...
False premise #1: God fakes nothing. God cannot lie, nor can he fail. However, man deceives himself routinely with regard to his own self-importance, and thereby routinely fails in his vain attempts to replace God’s power and wisdom with that of his enfeebled own understanding.
…to make all intelligent people believe in the process of evolution,...
False premise #2: Evolutionists are not quite so intelligent as either you or they may think they are. Nor do evolutionists as a group represent “all” intelligent persons.
I have studied with and worked alongside some evolutionists who appear to be nominally intelligent; I have met others – a number of posters to this board in fact -- who happen to be evolutionists of one sort or another, who are patently devoid of both knowledge of facts or even the requisite level of intelligence to support what are predominantly facile, MSM bilge-level arguments.
Those that think they created themselves, often mistakenly believe they both control and impact the Biosphere, and will attempt to con the masses into thinking the same. They are merely examples of Darwinistic simpletons that fancy themselves to be climate change "geniuses." Climate change frauds and evolutionary co-religionists have a number of acolytes over whom they hold sway. You appear to be one.
... and the nearly infinite amount of human knowledge which goes with it hand-in-hand, or your concept is grossly wrong.
False premise #3: Human knowledge is not infinite. Only God's knowledge is infinite. Laughably, for all the knowledge evolutionists claim to have, not a one can explain how or why they presumably created themselves.
Bye, bye, straw-man – and not a particularly good one at that.
Since you are certain that your ideas are correct, it must be true that you have chosen to believe something other than what God wants you to believe.
God expects mankind to believe Him. I do. You on the other hand have rather carelessly co-joined three premises into something which has (not surprisingly) brought you to a trebly false conclusion.
Why would you choose to do that?
I choose to believe God and to take Him at his Word. You might be well-advised to do the same before you persist much longer in misrepresenting Him and His character.
Just what, exactly did God say to you, the last time you spoke with Him?
Can you distill your stupidity into a shorter post, please, I don’t have time to read the unabridged version.
“You might be well-advised to do the same before you persist much longer in misrepresenting Him and His character. “
I your view, we evolution-believing Christians are already going to hell. What ELSE is He going to do to us?
Does it occur to you that a Communist could have written that in the 1930's? "Comrades, we know that the politically correct socialist path is right because of a network of billions of interdependent facts that show it to be true!" BTW, don't bother getting verklempt and saying that I'm accusing evolutionists of being atheists, commies or killers, that's not what I'm up to.
Or, couldn't you just hear Al Gore saying it? "The climate deniers fail to understand or choose to ignore the billions of interdependent facts that lead all serious climate scientists to conclude that we only have a few years left to prevent the massive destruction that manmade global climate change will cause."
I could go on. "Islam is true because...", "We know whites are inherently superior because..."...any number of bad conclusions. When one says evolution is a farce, one is not denying that there is a fact set, one is saying that the fact set is being misinterpreted, in part because challenging the interpretation is not allowed, so it reinforces itself.