Beam me to Planet Gore !
The article and the headline are almost incoherent. The reporter “sent” the emails. The reporter “received” the emails. And the reporter thinks that CRU emails revealing the fraud were a response to an article he wrote long after the emails were composed.
I’m sure there’s a kernel that is interesting here but you cannot tell it from the article.
It’s a curious thing....almost a month prior to this release....it was the BBC coming out and questioning several aspects of global warming. They knew that the mess would appear shortly within the mass media.
At the time, the BBC was condemned by several environmental groups over their sudden change in perception. Now, we can look back and see that they basically discovered the same issues and figured the entire scheme out.
The key to fixing this entire mess...for all sides...is peer review. This is something that the environmentalists do not want. The minute you involve math and statistics experts in to analyze your data...they will note every single mistake or “game”. But it’s the only way to be honest. Face it....Einstein has been peer-reviewed a million times...and will continue to be peer-reviewed for another 1,000 years. There’s nothing wrong with that.
Is ANY of this stuff showing up ANYWHERE in the Stalinist Media (ABC, CBS, NBC, etc)?
Indeed the credibility and integrity of science across the world is at stake, its time to find out what is really going on.Are there really no journalists left in the Big Media? Are they all nothing but a bunch of ideological slaves?
