Posted on 11/25/2009 4:44:38 PM PST by Shellybenoit
Some of the leading scientists in the "Holy Church of Global Warming Moonbats" have shown they have learned a very important rule from US President Barack Obama, when confronted with bad facts, attack the person(s) delivering the fact, call the news a big lie or say it was taken totally out of context. And NEVER, back up your claims with facts." That's how he defended himself against his Jeremiah Wright association, porkulus detractors and the opponents of Obamacare. Now Scientists are using that strategy to deflect the storm arising from those "Stolen" emails indicating a cover-up of contrary data by global warming proponents:
Three leading scientists who on Tuesday released a report documenting the accelerating pace of climate change said the scandal that erupted last week over hacked emails from climate scientists is nothing more than a "smear campaign" aimed at sabotaging December climate talks in Copenhagen.
(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...
I’m pretty sure that President Billyjeff has the honor of starting this form of defense.
History repeats itself again. Thou shalt not question THE AGENDA. Bernardo Gui has spoken.
Excellent article.
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!
So let me get this straight.....
.....emails from the climate scientists demonstrate they are "collaborating" in academic fraud
.....and the email leaker is smearing them with their own words?
And they call themselves logical scientists, who work with facts and not emotion? This is just more evidence that they are not capable of rational thought and their research conclusions should be viewed with great skepticism.
they lie.
like marxist muslim obama, allah tells him and them to lie for it is a virtue.
He doesn't deserve that much credit. It's a really old legal joke:
If the law is against you, argue the facts.
If the facts are against you, argue the law.
If both are against you, pound on the table.
They're going with option B.
Any “scientist” who supports those researchers who falsified, changed, omitted and/or manipulated data is unethical and a buffoon. They should be fired. Marxist bast**ds with no integrity.
Ditto
But then again Mrs. Billy Jeff did her senior thesis on Saul Alinsky so . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.