Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dila813
The BBC reporter may have received SOME of the e-mails on Oct 12th but, since some are dated a little over a week ago, he didn't get them all.

Still this is a curious twist to the story. I agree that it appears that the leaker, probably not a hacker, assumed giving the data to the BBC would get the story out there. Clearly this guy/gal is very inexperienced vis a vis the MSM. What is really laughable is that the BBC missed a scoop on what could be the biggest scientific scandal of the 21st Century. The reporter should be fired. More likely he will be promoted.

15 posted on 11/23/2009 3:28:47 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

More than likely it was an editor that was sitting on the story. A reporter, especially an ambitious one, would recognize a “make your bones” story.


17 posted on 11/23/2009 4:49:35 PM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint
I agree that it appears that the leaker, probably not a hacker, assumed giving the data to the BBC would get the story out there. Clearly this guy/gal is very inexperienced vis a vis the MSM.

If it really was a Russian Hacker, kinda doubt that cover story, their primary interest would be cash. So perhaps the BBC was being blackmailed over something - or else this information dump would be leaked. Perhaps the BBC failed to cover the minimum bid. Russian hackers have acquired expensive tastes of late.

18 posted on 11/23/2009 9:17:58 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson