Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jbjd

NH AG Says No way. http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/nh-ag-wont-touch-that-hotpotato/


37 posted on 11/24/2009 4:34:53 AM PST by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH

Of course he dropped this. Because no NH law requires the candidate whose name appears on the ballot to be qualified for the job. When my work was stolen, the thieves joined together to apply my concept of election fraud to NH. Only, this was not an applicable state for the complaints of election fraud to the AG, filed in applicable states like HI, GA, MD, TX, SC, and VA. Plus, they took it to the SoS, a state constitutional officer with no jurisdiction into criminal matters but whose authority only extends to ruling on the validity of the ballot in NH according to NH law. Their charge? BO committed fraud when he signed the application to get his name printed on the Presidential primary ballot. Big mistake. Because charging him with fraud meant proving he lied. What I mean is, he knows whether he is a NBC. So, in order to go after him, you would have to prove, he lied. That’s why I went after anyone else who Certified he was a NBC, like Nancy Pelosi, or Boyd Richie. How did THEY know he was a NBC before Certifying he was, and sending that Certification to state election officials? By forging ahead with the concept they stole from me, these thieves almost blew our legitimate causes of action. What do you suppose would have happened if the NH SoS had ruled, there was no ballot fraud? (And there wasn’t, in NH.) The AG in TX, where there WAS fraud, could have said, ‘Well, the SoS in NH has determined there was no ballot fraud and so, as far as I am concerned, the case is closed.’ Thank goodness, all the NH SoS did was refer the complaint ostensibly lodged by the NH state Rep. - did you know he was a named Plaintiff in one of Orly’s cases? - to the AG, who would not touch it.

Stealing my work is not only wrong on its face; it is also subverting the mission of that work. My readers are (or are becoming) educated voters. They have read the articles on my blog and asked questions. They sent in their complaints understanding what they were signing their names to. There is no shortcut here. You have to put in the time to become an informed voter. At least, you have to know as much about the system as those who would use their superior knowledge to have power over your lives.


41 posted on 11/24/2009 10:01:39 AM PST by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH

Greg, I NEVER link to that tripe. They not only nearly subverted the mission of the work that originates on my blog but they also called me names when I reported they were posting plagiarized material from CFP AND thereby subverting the work. (You can view that nasty quote from John Charlton by doing a search on my blog; after I posted it, he took his tirade against me, off his blog.)


45 posted on 11/24/2009 10:08:57 AM PST by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH

What you see here is the political punting the ball back to the other end of the field, and we have seen this over and over in all the three government and State branches as well. The real question is WHY and WHO are behind the ball???


57 posted on 11/24/2009 11:00:53 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson