Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MetaThought

Barbara Ann Radnofsky is either an idiot, or is pushing an agenda. The amendment’s first subsection defines marriage. Only an attorney, or someone looking to muck things up can ignore the first have of this amendment and then claim Texas is banning marriage or will not recognize marriage. Clearly, (IMO) the second phrase is stating the State will nor raise or recognize something else (not involving a man and a woman) as a marriage.

You may agree or disagree with the passage of the amendment but it is pretty clear in what is covered an not covered to me when I read it.


11 posted on 11/19/2009 10:01:27 AM PST by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thinkthenpost

I think she is polluting the waters on purpose to obfuscate the issue and force Texans to recognize Gay Marriage.


23 posted on 11/19/2009 10:14:01 AM PST by Tamar1973 (http://koreanforniancooking.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson