Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking
How about letting the states hold primaries in the order of republican predominance in 2008? Thus the most staunchly Republican states get the most say in who gets nominated.

That is a good idea. Problem is the states will race to see who goes first but I like your idea. Additionally, close the primaries to indies and dims. Of course none of this would affect the caucus states. Your ides is a step in the right direction.

18 posted on 11/15/2009 12:11:46 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Nuc1

I didn’t come up with it. It was one of several suggestions, in addition to the urgent need for closing primaries, that was brought forth following the 2008 nominating fiasco. What do you mean that states would race to see who goes first? What I was saying was that Oklahoma, who voted Republican 66-34 would go first, then Wyoming, who voted 65-33, then Utah and Idaho, at 62-38, and so on. So there’s no way to “race”, other than to vote more heavily Republican the previous election, and to race that way is acceptable. I agree that I don’t know what can be done about caucus states, other than to make a rule saying that no caucus state can caucus before states representing at least 20% of the delegates have voted, or something like that.


20 posted on 11/15/2009 12:26:26 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson