Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

“while the die-hard republicans still voted for her.”

Which tells me that die-hard republicans are not as smart as they claim to be - in other words dumber than a box of rocks. Third party NOW!


29 posted on 11/04/2009 6:52:09 AM PST by Cyclone59 (I ROCK, Guitar Hero said so........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Cyclone59

A lot of those votes could have been cast early, or been absentee. And certainly there were a few percent who just show up, don’t know what is happening, and “just vote republican”.


31 posted on 11/04/2009 7:03:46 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cyclone59

And I think this race proves the folly of pushing a 3rd party. Here we had an established 3rd party, with a candidate supported by tons of money and national figures, AND a major party candidate who suspended her campaign, and we still couldn’t get the 3rd-party win.

3rd-party is a good way to get rid of those who are nominally on your side but who you don’t think are good enough; it’s unlikely to actually win you an election, until the NEXT election (except THAT election will be “payback” time where the other side might run 3rd-party and hurt you, so it can take several cycles).

Look, Newt was dead wrong in this election because DeDe was a traitor, as was proven by her actions. But in general, he was right that we won’t defeat the democrats if we adopt a 3rd-party strategy.


33 posted on 11/04/2009 7:06:24 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson