Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commander in Chief or Commander in Least?
The American Thinker ^ | November 02, 2009 | Noah Steele Kline

Posted on 11/02/2009 4:19:25 AM PST by Scanian

As a Marine, Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran, and Honorably Discharged Sergeant, I know a thing or two about mission accomplishment versus troop welfare. As a matter of fact, any Marine can tell you the clearly stated objective of the Marine Corps is mission accomplishment. Troop welfare comes secondary.

Commanders and military leaders learned long ago that success on any battlefront depends chiefly upon mission accomplishment. Troop welfare, while important, does not trump mission accomplishment. For the enlisted Marine on the ground, this is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. But we understand. And actually, this is one of the reasons why the Marine Corps is one of the finest and most effective fighting forces in the world.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; dithering; obama; pressitutes

1 posted on 11/02/2009 4:19:25 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Great post!


2 posted on 11/02/2009 4:53:22 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

Glad you liked it.


3 posted on 11/02/2009 4:58:47 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson