Or, to put it another way, “LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA I’m going to ignore every fact before me LA LA LA LA LA”.
Do you really expect a complete total answer that will fit on your computer screen, understandable at a glance? or will you acknowledge that there is a plain logical sequencing of reasonable transitions backed up by real-world examples?
As a Creationist, I do find the arguments of fellow believers on the whole downright stupid and embarrassing. Much of the science is there, and snide dismissals doesn’t advance the cause any more than threatening to burn Galileo at the stake did.
Getting life to start at all, now there’s the interesting question...
and as a creationist, im not expecting an all encompassing explaination of how the eye came to be....i nvr said that, i merely pointed out that all we are given is pretty pics and graphs PLACED IN A SPECIFIC ORDER to fool folks into believing eyes evolved from a light sensitive spot.....all with ‘just so’ stories used as scientific evidence.
evolutionism is a a humanist religion, and im not an adherent, nor am i ignorant or stupid enough to believe in that fairy tale.