To: LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; Red Steel; pissant; hoosiermama; null and void; Amityschild; Calpernia; ...
Ping to Donofrio's take on today's ruling (re: Carter court).
2 posted on
10/29/2009 5:26:40 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid; rocco55; thouworm; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; ...
Donofrio's take on today's ruling (re: Carter court).
.
3 posted on
10/29/2009 5:28:51 PM PDT by
LucyT
To: LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; Red Steel; pissant; hoosiermama; null and void; Amityschild; Calpernia
In particular, this part...
Meanwhile, its important for me to point out that everything I have told readers of this blog about quo warranto was confirmed by Judge Carter today. JUDGE CARTER DID NOT HOLD THAT QUO WARRANTO WAS IMPROPER TO CHALLENGE THE ELIGIBILITY OF A SITTING PRESIDENT.
This was the most extraordinary part of todays ruling. It opens the door wide for a proper eligibility challenge in the DC District Court where the hurdle for standing is different from ordinary federal cases.
Please take note that the Department of Justice attorneys argued before Judge Carter that quo warranto even if brought properly in the DC District Court could not be used to challenge the eligibility of a sitting President. Judge Carters ruling did not support the Department of Justice position.
The ruling today affirms that the proper venue for challenging the eligibility of a sitting President is the DC District Court.
This is a very encouraging ruling for those contemplating a quo warranto challenge to President Obamas eligibility in the DC District Court.
5 posted on
10/29/2009 5:33:58 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
6 posted on
10/29/2009 5:34:06 PM PDT by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: rxsid
Therefore, either a special prosecutor must be named for purposes of allowing the Congressional intent of the quo warranto statute to be realized, or the DC District Court may waive the requirement and examine any verified petition on its own consent.Please explain to me WHO would name a special prosecutor?
28 posted on
10/29/2009 6:36:24 PM PDT by
azishot
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson