[BP2]

Go back and look at posts 88, 90, 91. I did not confuse a Court clerk with a Law Clerk — I posted what was convenient at the moment. Google “law clerk tampering” and you’ll find plenty of examples if it so suits you.

Sorry to be "ATTACKING" the poor clerk — yeah, the talking points are out.

The only one confused is yourself in your loyalty in offering aid and comfort to the man who will throw campaigner & schill alike under the bus when it’s politically convenient for him.

Not that it matters anyway — a conflict of interest exists. Studies show that law clerks are very influential in the formation of case law through their influence on judges’ decisions.

Further, as I recall, the Seattle Perkins Coie office was working a high-profile Obama eligibility case about the same time Velamoor starting working there... and I suspect Velamoor — who specializes in "product liability" while also majoring in international relations — was working THAT case ...

[kukaniloko]

So a Marine and Federal Judge who has had the case for months and has conducted at least three hearings on the matter is going to be improperly influenced by a newly hired law clerk? That must be part of the analog-to-digital tinfoil upgrade.