.
Posted on 10/18/2009 3:34:59 PM PDT by Publius772000
In a video that’s beginning to gain attention among conservatives and all others who wish to preserve the sovereignty of the United States, Lord Christopher Monckton tells why the COP15 meeting in Copenhagen could be vital to the future of America.
[VIDEO ON SITE]
When you look at the document that the COP (Conference of the Parties) is based upon, it’s easy to see why Lord Monckton is concerned. You can reach the original agreement through the link below and read it for yourself. According to the UN’s website, the U.S. became a party to this treaty in March 1994.
Original UN COP Agreement:
Article 3.3: “Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing such measures…” In other words, the COP is asking members to not allow facts from getting in the way of its global climate policy.
Article 3.5: “The Parties should cooperate to promote a supportive and open international economic system that would lead to sustainable economic growth and development in all Parties, particularly developing country Parties, thus enabling them better to address the problems of climate change.” In Article 3 of the original Convention, the agreement exhorts members to, apparently, look toward a single world economy that would better help the “developing” nations adapt their individual economic systems to cope with climate change. Given this goal, it should come as no surprise that nations are now meeting to remove the dollar as the world standard.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconstitutionalalamo.com ...
In just a few weeks, President Obama will join other world leaders for a climate change conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. At that COP 15 conference, he will likely be asked to sign a new climate change treaty that appears to establish a world governmental organization that would enforce environmental regulations and enforce the redistribution of wealth from the “developed” countries, namely the United States, to the “developing” countries.
I don’t understand how this is not an impeachable offense on its face, since at his swear-in, 0bama swore to uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.
Not that it’s a big deal or anything.
Churchill said something to the effect that if you don’t fight when you have some odds on your side, then you will be forced to fight with all the odds against you. Sadly, it looks like Churchill’s latter scenario of odds against us has arrived. The very survival of this country is at stake.
You do realize that the Constitution itself says that treaties we sign on to become part of the Supreme Law of the land don’t you?
“at his swear-in, 0bama swore to uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.”
Remember, his first attempt to be sworn in was botched, and when they re-did it he didn’t swear on a Bible.
All the public saw of the second "swearing in" was a photograph, not a video. How do we the public know what REALLY happened? For all we know BO was asking CJ Roberts if he was up for a game of tiddlywinks.
thought you might find this interesting ping
“…if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” — Winston Churchill
Poignant, and, sadly, it may become painfully relevant to us.
.
“Why do the nations rage and the people plot a vain thing, the kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying, Let us brake Their bonds in pecies And cast away Their cords from us. HE WHO SITS IN THE HEAVENS SHALL LAUGH;THE LORD SHALL HOLD THEM IN DERISION. THEN HE SHALL SPEAK TO THEM IN HIS WRATH,AND DISTRESS THEM IN HIS DEEP DISPLEAURE. Yet I have set My King On My holy hill of Zion WE ARE FAST COMMING UPON THE FINAL BATTLE OF THE AGES. SATAN AND HIS LEGIONS ARE SETTING UP THERE FAULSE PERVESE KINGDOM TO MOCK THE LORD YESHUA’S COMING KINGDOM. BUT OUR GOD HAS HIS OWN STARATEGY. REVIVAL IS COMMING TO THE WORLD LIKE NEVER BEFOURE SEEN. OUR GOD WILL SHARE HIS THRONE WITH NONE OTHER!
Beck is doing the Lord Christopher Monckton story this coming week.
Beck is the only one looking for these kinds of stories. Hopefully, he’ll get the word out so that, if this comes to pass and Obama actually signs this treaty, the Senate will refuse to ratify.
The senate refuse to ratify? THIS wimpy senate? Would to God we had some Jessee Helms types in the senate.
can’t we find an impeachable offense to remove this guy?
Or even Sam Nunn or Zell Miller... the Dems have become sheep and the Repubs are spineless.
So, how can this be stopped?
The House and Senate would ratify anything. The courts would take years. We have no recourse but ___!
I used to think that the real powder-keg for an honest-to-goodness revolution in America would be an amnesty law that would grant franchise to millions of illegals, thereby entrenching the liberals in power for the foreseeable future. Now I’m wondering if that fuse may be shorter than even I believed... and maybe that pile of TNT may be ignited in a matter of weeks. I’m calling and writing my senator, but it’s Saxby Chambliss, and he bends over backwards to work with the libs at every opportunity, so I can see him voting for this travesty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.