Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg buys Business Week for a Song (BW almost had to pay - Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
All Things Digital ^ | October 13, 2009 | Peter Kafka

Posted on 10/13/2009 7:05:56 PM PDT by abb

What’s one of the biggest names in magazine publishing worth? These days, maybe $5 million, plus debt.

That’s the high end of the range Bloomberg will be paying for BusinessWeek, reports BusinessWeek, which has done an excellent job of covering its sale. Can’t call this one a surprise, as Bloomberg has reportedly been the lead bidder for some time now. BusinessWeek employees spent most of the day waiting for an announcement to that effect, and finally heard one, via Bloomberg’s wire service, shortly after 5 pm EDT.

Shortly after, BusinessWeek Editor Stephen J. Adler gathered his troops for an informal meeting to discuss the news and to discuss some blocking and tackling: No news on rumored (and expected) layoffs. But he did tell staffers that those who are cut after the deal closes later this year will receive the same severance package they would have gotten if they were still employed by McGraw-Hill (MHP), the magazine’s parent company.

There most certainly will be cuts: McGraw-Hill is selling the 80-year-old magazine because it’s a money pit that was losing between $20 million and $40 million a year, depending on your accounting. And the publisher’s bankers promoted a layoff plan as part of the sales process.

What exactly deep-pocketed Bloomberg intends to do with the publication, however, is unclear. The company, which makes its money renting its namesake terminals to Wall Street traders, is thought to be running its magazine and TV news operations at a loss as it tries to grab a footprint in consumer media. It may ultimately be willing to run BusinessWeek at a loss for a while, as well.

And now a tiny bit of context: At the beginning of this year, there were four major business magazines. Now one, Condé Nast’s Portfolio, has been shut down and another sold at a fire-sale price. Meanwhile, my former colleagues at Forbes expect to hear about yet another restructuring round in the near future. And while Time Warner (TWX) CEO Jeff Bewkes was careful to list Fortune magazine among the core assets at his company’s Time Inc. unit at an industry event today, that can’t assure the queasy souls who work there.

Here’s the memo to BusinessWeek staff from the magazine’s BusinessWeek publisher, Keith Fox:

All,

Moments ago, McGraw-Hill announced that Bloomberg L.P. has agreed to acquire BusinessWeek. This is exciting news on many levels. Joining forces with another of the world’s leading news organizations enhances BusinessWeek’s ability to further serve our global audience and our valued customers. And Bloomberg will gain a powerful brand with a history of editorial excellence and strong reach among business professionals.

While the ink is barely dry and the long-term plans are being worked out, we do know that Bloomberg is committed to and values our brand, our editorial integrity, and our ability to drive advertising, circulation, and new digital revenue.

BusinessWeek will strengthen Bloomberg’s online, television and mobile products and creates an opportunity for Bloomberg News to reach decision makers in the c-suite. Online, BusinessWeek.com and Bloomberg.com will have more unique visitors than any non-portal business and financial site. In addition, Bloomberg expects to build television content around the powerful BusinessWeek brand and our world-class journalists.

I am tremendously proud of the work all of you have done in the past few months. Despite the uncertainty, we have continued to produce first-class products for our readers and advertisers, and I want to thank you deeply for your efforts. I also want to thank Steve Adler, Jessica Sibley, Tania Secor, Roger Neal, and Linda Brennan, for their extraordinary ability to personify the best of BusinessWeek during the deal process while leading their respective organizations.

I know that while this announcement answers some of the questions you’ve been asking over the past few months, it raises others. The sale is expected to close by the end of the year and we will be working on transition plans in the coming weeks. I can tell you that all BusinessWeek staffers will remain employees of The McGraw-Hill Companies until the transaction closes, and that it will be business as usual–producing the magazine and the website, and serving our advertisers–through the close. We will give you more details when we can.

We’ll be holding a town hall meeting later today at 5:45 EST, after which a Q&A will be provided to all employees; you will receive more details shortly. A call for the Asia teams will be scheduled shortly.

Again, I want to thank you all for your professionalism and dedication during a challenging time. I look forward to working with you on the promising next chapter in BusinessWeek’s history.

Keith


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: advertising; businessweek; dbm; magazines
OUCH!
1 posted on 10/13/2009 7:05:57 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


2 posted on 10/13/2009 7:06:34 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

BW is a lib piece of sh*t run by the lefties at McGraw Hill. They publish school books so they are lib whores. BW also had a lefty bias.


3 posted on 10/13/2009 7:09:17 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2009/10/bloomberg_wins.html
Bloomberg Wins Bidding For BusinessWeek

http://www.poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=13996
BLOOMBERG AGREES TO ACQUIRE BUSINESSWEEK

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-does-bloomberg-want-businessweek-2009-10-13
Why does Bloomberg want BusinessWeek?

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091013/FREE/910139993/0/newsletter
Time Warner CEO stands by magazine division

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Earnings-preview-Modest-hopes-apf-38756297.html?x=0&.v=1
Earnings preview: Modest hopes for McClatchy’s 3Q

http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/pressed/2009/10/13/keep-businessweek-for-sale-forever-a-modest-proposal/
Keep BusinessWeek For Sale Forever: A Modest Proposal

http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2009/10/13/12432/star_tribune_to_drop_saturday_newsstand_edition
Star Tribune to drop Saturday newsstand edition

http://www.foliomag.com/2009/magazine-foldings-track-match-last-year-s-totals
Believe It or Not, Fewer Magazines Folding in 2009


4 posted on 10/13/2009 7:10:26 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Fortune is another lib POS that is going down in flames at Time Warner. They voted for this.

Forbes used to be good but they have made rich one of Hussein’s closest advisors who was an early bankroller of his campaign. The guy has had a column in Forbes for at least a decade and he sucks. Forbes essentially made this guy very rich which helped elect Obama. I cancelled Forbes as well because of this.


5 posted on 10/13/2009 7:13:46 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

http://cancelthebee.blogspot.com/

News & Observer publisher announces buyouts; number of affected employees is unknown


6 posted on 10/13/2009 7:17:38 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

Business Weak had become a Marxist organ, so good riddance. I’m no big fan of bloomberg, so we’ll have to wait and see if this change is an improvement.


7 posted on 10/13/2009 7:22:42 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Not much call for an anti-business business magazine. Hopefully Bloomberg will nudge it ever so lightly to the right.


8 posted on 10/13/2009 7:27:16 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (He said red, yellow, black or white, All are equal in his sight, Mmm, mmm, mm!, Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb
"That’s the high end of the range Bloomberg will be paying for BusinessWeek, reports BusinessWeek, which has done an excellent job of covering its sale."

The comdey, it just writes itself. LOL

9 posted on 10/13/2009 8:06:15 PM PDT by Landru (If you want to perform for 15 mins, 30 mins, 1 hour, 5 days, a YEAR! Call...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
"Not much call for an anti-business business magazine. Hopefully Bloomberg will nudge it ever so lightly to the right."

Hopefully like he did NYCity, Lucius?

Naaaaaa. LOL

10 posted on 10/13/2009 8:09:49 PM PDT by Landru (If you want to perform for 15 mins, 30 mins, 1 hour, 5 days, a YEAR! Call...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb

$2 to 5 million my butt. The final terms weren't announced -- which usually means there's some earn-out provisions and performance kickers which can (and will) cut the price much lower.

McGraw Hill essentially gave the old dog away rather than killing it outright.

11 posted on 10/14/2009 12:19:31 AM PDT by Zakeet (Central Park Zoo vs. White House -- one has an African Lion -- other has a lyin' African)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Fewer magazines folding in ‘09 than in ‘07 and ‘08? Probably because there are a lot fewer to fold.


12 posted on 10/15/2009 4:03:25 PM PDT by MovementConservative (Go Ducks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

Exactly. And the ones left have fewer and fewer ad pages.


13 posted on 10/15/2009 4:07:43 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson